|
Dam-break flow experiment : The Isolated Building Test Case
S. SOARES FRAZÃO Dept. Civ. and Env. Engrg., Université
catholique de Louvain, Belgium
soares@gce.ucl.ac.be
Y. ZECH Dept. Civ. and
Env. Engrg., Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
zech@gce.ucl.ac.be
1. Introduction
2. Test case Desciption
2.1 Location of
the gauges
2.2 Location of
the building
2.3 Initial Conditions
2.4 Boundary Conditions
2.5 Expected results
3. Acknowledgements
Download PDF file
Submission Guidelines
1. Introduction
This test case aims at investigating the effects
of a single building on a dam-break flow. It is part of the
broader study of flood propagation in urban areas undertaken
within the frame of the IMPACT project.
In preliminary studies, it appeared that,
especially in the first instants after the dam break and the
immediate vicinity of the dam, buildings can have major consequences
on the flow. In those cases, they cannot be considered only
as inducing a reduced flow conveyance or an increased bed
friction slowing down the wave propagation. Indeed, the flow
route can be modified, or the flood wave can reflect against
the building, increasing the upstream water depths dramatically.
Back to top
In order to investigate those near-field effects,
and with the aim to assess the consequences further downstream
in the valley and at later times, this idealised test case
has been designed. The experiments were carried out in the
Civil Engineering Laboratory of the Université catholique
de Louvain (UCL) in Belgium. The channel and building dimensions
are indicated on the sketch (see last page), as well as the
position of the water level gauges used to record the time
evolution of the water level. Note that the channel (and reservoir)
cross section has a trapezoidal shape near the bed. The gate
is located between two impermeable blocks and the cross section
there is rectangular and narrower than the channel cross-section.
The channel bed is horizontal.
Back to top
2.1. Location of
the gauges
The location of the gauges is indicated on
the sketch. Their exact position regarding the origin of the
axis (centre of the gate) is summarised in the following table
:
 |
 |
x (m)
|
x (m)
|
 |
 |
|
G1
|
2.65
|
1.15
|
|
G2
|
2.65
|
-0.60
|
|
G3
|
4.00
|
1.15
|
|
G4
|
4.00
|
-0.80
|
|
G5
|
5.20
|
0.30
|
|
G6
|
-1.87
|
1.10
|
Back to top
2.2. Location of
the building
The location and dimensions of the building
are indicated on the sketch. The exact co-ordinates of the
four corners of the building regarding the origin of the axis
(see sketch) are summarised in the following table:
 |
 |
x (m)
|
x (m)
|
 |
 |
|
b1
|
3.40
|
-0.05
|
|
b2
|
3.76
|
-0.23
|
|
b3
|
4.11
|
0.49
|
|
b4
|
3.75
|
0.67
|
Back to top
Water depth in the reservoir : h0
= 0.40 m
Water depth in the channel : h0 = 0.01 m
To simulate the dam break, the gate separating the reservoir
from the channel is pulled up rapidly, resulting in an instantaneous
dam break.
Back to top
The upstream end of the channel is a closed
wall. At the far downstream end of the channel (ca. 29 m from
the gate), there is sediment settling system making this boundary
an unclear combination of weirs and walls. However, it was
observed that there is no influence of this boundary condition
during the first 30 seconds after the dam break. It is thus
left to the modeller to use any downstream boundary condition
he likes provided this does not influence the flow during
the duration of the experiment.
Back to top
- Short description of the numerical simulation including
- The numerical method used, or a reference where a description
of the method can be found;
- The type of mesh used (square, rectangular, triangular,
quadragular), the number of computational cells or points,
the duration of the simulation (real time elapsed during
the computation);
- Comments regarding the results and the simulation, if
any.
- Results at the gauging points (G1
G6): a text file
with the following format (thus 1 file)
|
Col 1
|
Col 2
|
Col 3
|
Col 4
|
...
|
Col 17
|
Col 18
|
Col 19
|
|
|
|
Time(s)
|
G1 water
depth (m)
|
G1 u-velocity
(m/s)
|
G1 v-velocity
(m/s)
|
...
|
G6 water
level (m)
|
G6 u-velocity
(m/s)
|
G6 v-velocity
(m/s)
|
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
The experimental measurements were recorded with a time step
of 0.01 s.
- Water level and velocities over the whole channel at the
following specific times : t = 1 s, 5 s, 10 s, 20 s, with
the following file format for each time (thus 4 files)
|
Col 1
|
Col 2
|
Col 3
|
Col 4
|
Col 5
|
|
|
|
x (m)
|
y (m)
|
h water (m)
|
u (m/s)
|
v (m/s)
|
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
...
|
Please note that the origin of the axis is
located at the centre of the gate (see sketch). The u and
v velocities are the velocity components according to the
x and y directions.
 |
Click on the image to see a
larger version |
Back to top
The authors wish to acknowledge the financial
support offered by the European commission for the IMPACT
project under the fifth framework programme (1998-2002), environment
and sustainable development thematic programme, for which
Karen Fabbri was the EC project officer.

To view the PDF document for the isolated
building test case click
here.
(Note: To download the PDF document right-click
on the link and select 'Save Target As'.)
- The deadline for submisison of results is 31 May 2003
- Please email results and questions to either Benjamin
Noel or Sandra
Soares
|